Call Now Free Quote
(847) 713-1648 Get Free Estimate
Tuckpointing - Wilmette, IL

Full Facade Tuckpointing - 1925 Bungalow, East Wilmette

July 17, 2024 | East Wilmette near Lake Avenue

Before: Full Facade Tuckpointing - 1925 Bungalow, East Wilmette Before
After: Full Facade Tuckpointing - 1925 Bungalow, East Wilmette After
Location Wilmette, IL
Service Tuckpointing
Scope 190 linear feet of mortar joint restoration across the full facade of a 1925 Chicago common brick bungalow. All four elevations tuckpointed with lime-rich Type O mortar matched to the original low-strength specification. Included removal of incompatible modern patch material on the east elevation and restoration of the original concave joint profile.
Mortar Type Type O lime-rich (1:2:9 portland-lime-sand)
Duration 4 days
Building 1925 Bungalow

The Problem

A realtor flagged the mortar condition on this 1925 bungalow in East Wilmette near Lake Avenue during a pre-sale inspection. The inspection report noted recessed joints on the north and west elevations, with several locations showing mortar loss exceeding one inch. The homeowner was preparing to list and needed a documented repair before closing.

When we walked the home, the inspection report was accurate but incomplete. The south elevation showed early-stage mortar recession that had not yet been flagged, and the east elevation had a section of old patch material applied in an incompatible mix. That patch was already pulling away from the brick face and had induced hairline cracking in three adjacent brick units.

The bungalow style construction common to this stretch of East Wilmette uses Chicago common brick - a soft, high-absorption brick that requires a compliant, lime-rich mortar to function correctly. Running anything harder than Type N on a home like this accelerates spalling, which is exactly what the east patch had begun doing.

Our Solution

We removed deteriorated mortar across all four elevations to a minimum depth of 3/4 inch, using 4-inch angle grinders with depth-limited diamond cup wheels to avoid overcutting the soft brick edges. On the north wall, where joint recession exceeded one inch in multiple locations, we ground to full depth and cleaned the joint cavity with compressed air before packing.

The replacement mortar was a lime-rich Type O blend at 1:2:9 portland-lime-sand ratio. We mixed in batches of no more than 45 minutes of working time given the July heat. The sand used was a buff-tone local aggregate matched against the extracted core sample from the porch joint. All joints were packed in two lifts, with the first lift allowed to stiffen before the second lift was tooled to a concave profile matching the original.

The incompatible east elevation patch was fully removed with hand chisels to avoid vibration damage to the already-stressed brick faces. Those 22 linear feet were cut back, cleaned, and repacked with the same Type O blend used across the rest of the home.

The Result

The completed work brought all four elevations into consistent condition. Mortar color across the new joints matched the original protected joints on the porch to within a visible shade under daylight. The east elevation no longer shows the patch seam that had been visible from the street.

We provided the homeowner with a written repair summary and the mortar formula used, formatted for inclusion in the disclosure documents for the sale. The listing proceeded on schedule.

Related: Tuckpointing Services | Wilmette Service Area

Questions About This Project

Why was Type O mortar specified instead of a stronger mix?

The original 1925 brickwork used soft Chicago common brick with low compressive strength. A stronger mortar like Type S or N would create a mismatch in stiffness, causing the brick face to spall rather than allowing the mortar joint to flex and absorb movement. Type O keeps the joint as the sacrificial element, which is the correct design intent for this era of construction.

How did you match the original mortar color on a 100-year-old home?

We extracted a mortar core from a protected interior joint on the porch side of the home where weathering had not altered the original color. We then matched aggregate size and sand color against three test batches, curing each batch and comparing to the extracted sample under natural light before committing to the full mix.

The home had been patched before. Did that affect the repair scope?

Yes. The east elevation had roughly 22 linear feet patched with a Portland-heavy mix at some point in the last two decades. That patch had already induced hairline cracking in adjacent brick faces. We removed all of it, cleaned the brick edges, and replaced it with correct Type O material. The mismatched patch was doing more harm than the open joints it had covered.

Project Location

Loading map - 1 project in this area

Need Similar Work? Let's Fix It Right.

Free on-site inspection and written estimate - no obligation. Serving the North Shore and Chicagoland for over 39 years.

(847) 713-1648 Request Online Estimate